Current:Home > NewsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -TradeGrid
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:04:25
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (72946)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Jerome Powell's fed speech today brought interest rate commentary and a hot mic moment
- What Biden's executive order on AI does and means
- Andre Iguodala named acting executive director of National Basketball Players Association
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- These are the best days of the year to shop for holiday deals on electronics
- Texas judge rules against GOP lawsuit seeking to toss 2022 election result in Houston area
- Tensions between Dominican Republic and Haiti flare after a brief armed standoff at the border
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Philip Pullman is honored in Oxford, and tells fans when to expect his long-awaited next book
Ranking
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Driver charged in 2022 crash that killed Los Angeles sheriff’s recruit, injured 24 others
- Hungary asks EU to take action against Bulgaria’s transit tax on Russian gas
- Abigail Breslin sued by 'Classified' movie producers after accusation against Aaron Eckhart
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Jerome Powell's fed speech today brought interest rate commentary and a hot mic moment
- Sex therapist Dr. Ruth is NY's first loneliness ambassador – just what the doctor ordered
- Shawn Mendes Strips Down at the Beach With Big Brother UK’s Charlie Travers
Recommendation
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Dylan Mulvaney Shares Update on Dating Life Amid Celebratory New Chapter
Why Taylor Swift Sends Kelly Clarkson Flowers After Every Re-Recording
Embattled Missouri House speaker hires a former House speaker who pleaded guilty to assault
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
Awkward in the NL Central: Craig Counsell leaving for Cubs dials up rivalry with Brewers
Ole Miss, Kiffin seek dismissal of lawsuit filed by Rebels football player
Expensive judicial races might be here to stay in Pennsylvania after record high court campaign