Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeGrid
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-23 02:56:30
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7325)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Dollar Tree to close nearly 1,000 stores, posts surprise fourth quarter loss
- Paul Alexander, Who Spent 70 Years in an Iron Lung, Dead at 78
- Nearly half of U.S. homes face severe threat from climate change, study finds
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- SZA reflects on having breast implants removed due to cancer risk: 'I didn't feel good'
- Major snowstorm hits Colorado, closing schools, government offices and highways
- Love Is Blind’s Jimmy Reveals He’s Open to Dating AD After Calling Off Chelsea Wedding
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- HIV prevention drugs known as PrEP are highly effective, but many at risk don't know about them
Ranking
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Indianapolis Colts sign 2023 comeback player of the year Joe Flacco as backup quarterback
- Love Is Blind's Trevor Sova Sets the Record Straight on Off-Screen Girlfriend Claims
- Kentucky should reconsider using psychedelics to treat opioid addiction, attorney general says
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- California Votes to Consider Health and Environment in Future Energy Planning
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents roll out body cameras to agents in five cities
- The Excerpt podcast: Climate change is making fungi a much bigger threat
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Storm carrying massive ‘gorilla hail’ threatens parts of Kansas and Missouri
10 lies scammers tell to separate you from your money
Horoscopes Today, March 13, 2024
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Early results show lower cancer rates than expected among Air Force nuclear missile personnel
Don Lemon's show canceled by Elon Musk on X, a year after CNN firing
Oklahoma outlawed cockfighting in 2002. A push to weaken penalties has some crowing fowl play